Published OnFebruary 7, 2025
Ancient Connections from the Andes to Polynesia
possible contact between the old civilizations of South America possible contact between the old civilizations of South America

Ancient Connections from the Andes to Polynesia

This episode examines pre-Columbian trade networks like the Qhapaq Ñan, linking Andean and Amazonian societies through goods such as coca leaves and Spondylus shells. We also discuss evidence of connections between South America and Polynesia, including sweet potato exchanges and Thor Heyerdahl’s Kon-Tiki expedition. Finally, we evaluate cultural parallels from Andean ceramics to Japanese pottery, while addressing the complexities of proving ancient intercontinental contact.

Chapter 1

Pre-Columbian Trade and Interactions in South America

Eric Marquette

Let’s start by diving into the incredible trade systems and interactions that shaped pre-Columbian South America. The Andean civilizations—groups like the Incas, Moche, Nazca, and others—were interconnected by an extensive network of trade routes. And the jewel of this network was the Qhapaq Ñan, the great Inca road system. This was no ordinary path, we’re talking about something that spanned over 24,000 miles—mountains, valleys—you name it, this thing cut through it. It linked far-flung regions and allowed for the movement of goods, people, and even ideas. Textiles, coca leaves, these bright orange Spondylus shells that were prized in rituals—all of it flowed through this artery of civilization.

Eric Marquette

Now, it's not just about the Andes staying within their bubble, so to speak. There’s evidence of trade and interaction with Amazonian societies, where highland and lowland cultures exchanged goods and agricultural knowledge. Picture it—textiles heading down from the mountains while different crops or fish from the Amazon traveled upwards. It’s, kind of, this vibrant back-and-forth, and we can actually see it in the archaeological record. Farmers in separate regions shared practices—like irrigation and terracing—that helped crops thrive in dramatically different environments. It’s, honestly, just fascinating how resourceful and interconnected they were.

Eric Marquette

And we shouldn’t overlook how these exchanges helped spread culture, too. Unique artistic styles, tools, even ways of worshipping traveled alongside those goods. What’s really striking is how this thriving internal trade set the stage, kind of, for broader exchanges and maybe even... well, we’ll get into that soon.

Chapter 2

Theories of Trans-Pacific Connections

Eric Marquette

When we think about trade and cultural exchange, it's easy to stick to, sort of, regional boundaries. But here's where it gets even more fascinating—there’s growing evidence of connections between South America and Polynesia long before Europeans set foot in the Americas. And the star of this story? The humble sweet potato. It turns out, this crop, which is native to South America, somehow made its way across the vast expanse of the Pacific to Polynesia. Genetic studies suggest this happened around 1000 CE, a good 500 years before Columbus sailed westward.

Eric Marquette

Now, here's the kicker—linguists have pointed out that the Polynesian word for sweet potato, “kumara,” bears a striking resemblance to the Quechua word, “kumal,” in South America. Coincidence? Maybe... or maybe not. And and this isn’t just theoretical—archaeologists have found remnants of the sweet potato in Polynesian sites, suggesting that either the Polynesians voyaged to South America, or South Americans somehow voyaged west. Just think about that for a moment—a journey across thousands of miles of open ocean, without modern navigation tools.

Eric Marquette

And speaking of journeys, this idea of ancient trans-Pacific contact got a major boost in 1947, thanks to a Norwegian explorer named Thor Heyerdahl. You might’ve heard of the Kon-Tiki expedition? Heyerdahl built a balsa wood raft—using only ancient methods—and sailed it from Peru to Polynesia. Now, his trip didn’t prove direct historical contact, but it certainly showed that such a voyage was possible. I mean, he basically demonstrated that the technology of the time could have supported trans-oceanic travel.

Eric Marquette

But it’s not just about crops or rafts. Recent genetic research has really added an interesting layer to this story. Some DNA studies suggest a connection between Polynesians and certain Indigenous South American groups. It’s subtle, but it’s there—and it raises big questions about human movement, migration patterns, and cultural blending. Did Polynesians land on South American shores and return home with new crops and cultural ideas? Or, I mean, could South Americans have sailed into the Pacific, bringing their sweet potatoes along for the ride?

Eric Marquette

Whatever the case, these findings push us to rethink what we know about ancient navigation, trade, and even the way people viewed the world. It’s not just a story of isolated civilizations, but maybe one of shared innovation and exploration.

Chapter 3

Cultural Parallels and Contesting Theories

Eric Marquette

Let’s shift gears now to some of the more debated theories about contact or influence across continents—starting with claims about African connections. One idea, often tied to the colossal stone heads of the Olmec civilization in Mesoamerica, suggests that African cultures may have reached the Americas long before Europeans. The reason? These heads have facial features that some claim resemble African traits. But here’s where it gets tricky—most archaeologists agree these heads reflect indigenous artistic traditions, not evidence of contact. In other words, what some see as a connection might just be a fascinating coincidence, you know?

Eric Marquette

And then there's the story of the Mali Empire. There’s this theory that during the 14th century, Emperor Abu Bakr II financed voyages westward across the Atlantic. Some believe it could’ve led to early African explorers making their way to South America. But, honestly, the evidence here is paper-thin. We’re talking about oral histories and a lot of “what ifs.” Without solid archaeological finds, it's hard to place much weight on these claims. Still, it’s amazing to think about the possibilities, right?

Eric Marquette

Now, let’s look east—to Asia. There’s this intriguing claim about similarities between Andean ceramics and Japanese Jōmon pottery. Both have these intricate, geometric designs that some say point to a shared artistic influence. But does that mean direct contact? Probably not. Most scholars think these similarities are better explained by independent development—humans in different parts of the world often came up with similar solutions or styles. It’s just, kind of, how creativity works, I guess.

Eric Marquette

The challenge with all of these theories is proving them. Think about it—a few artistic parallels or speculative stories aren’t enough. To confidently say there was contact, we'd need something concrete: artifacts from one culture showing up in the other, genetic evidence, written accounts... and so far, we don’t really have that. It’s a tough nut to crack because civilizations can develop similar technologies, art, or even religious practices completely independently. The pyramids in Egypt and Mesoamerica are a great example—both built massive structures without any evidence of connection.

Eric Marquette

So where does all of this leave us? Well, it highlights just how interconnected yet independent ancient civilizations could be. The debate between diffusion and independent development is fascinating because it challenges us to think about innovation in both global and local terms. And and while many of these theories are still contested, they push us to keep asking questions, to keep searching for evidence, and maybe even to rethink the limits of what ancient cultures could achieve.

Eric Marquette

On that note, I think we’ll wrap it there. This idea of ancient connections—whether rooted in trade, migration, or shared ingenuity—gives us so much to consider. Thanks for tuning in, and until next time, keep exploring the past with an open mind. Talk soon!

About the podcast

outline the possible contact between the old civilizations of South America ... • ChatGPT said: The possible contact between the old civilizations of South America and other regions has been a topic of debate among historians, archaeologists, and anthropologists. Here’s an outline of the key theories and evidence: 1. Internal Contact within South America • Andean Civilizations (Inca, Moche, Chavín, Nazca, Tiwanaku, etc.): Extensive trade networks, such as the Qhapaq Ñan (Inca road system), connected various cultures. • Amazonian and Coastal Interactions: Evidence of trade between highland and lowland societies, including exchange of goods like Spondylus shells, coca leaves, and textiles. 2. Possible Contact with Mesoamerica • Trade and Cultural Parallels: Similar pyramid structures, step temples, and religious iconography between the Andean and Mesoamerican civilizations. • Evidence of Maize Cultivation: Maize, which originated in Mesoamerica, was cultivated in South America, suggesting early trade or diffusion. • Mythological and Artistic Similarities: Some deities and motifs resemble those of the Olmecs, Maya, and Aztecs. 3. Theories of Transoceanic Contact • Pacific Contact (Polynesia-South America): o Sweet Potato Evidence: The presence of the sweet potato (originating in South America) in Polynesia before European contact suggests pre-Columbian trans-Pacific exchange. o Genetic Evidence: DNA studies show some genetic links between Polynesians and certain Indigenous South American populations. o Rafts and Navigation: Thor Heyerdahl’s Kon-Tiki expedition (1947) demonstrated the feasibility of ancient Peruvians reaching Polynesia. • Atlantic Contact (Africa-South America): o Pre-Columbian African Contact Hypothesis: Some researchers speculate that African seafarers, such as those from the Mali Empire, could have reached the Americas. o Olmec and South American Artifacts: Some claim similarities between Olmec heads and African features, though this remains controversial. • Ancient Asian Contact (China, Japan, Southeast Asia-South America): o Japanese Jōmon Pottery Resemblance: Some pottery styles resemble those found in Japan. o Possible Buddhist Influence: Some petroglyphs and myths suggest Asian influence, but evidence is limited. 4. European and Middle Eastern Contact Hypotheses • Phoenician or Carthaginian Voyages: Some suggest that Phoenician sailors, known for their long-distance navigation, could have reached South America. • Roman Artifacts in Brazil: Discovery of alleged Roman amphoras off the Brazilian coast has sparked theories of ancient European contact, though authenticity is debated. 5. Skepticism and Challenges • Lack of Definitive Archaeological Evidence: Many claims remain speculative due to a lack of concrete proof. • Possibility of Independent Development: Similarities in structures or cultural elements may have arisen independently rather than through contact. While some theories remain controversial, increasing genetic, linguistic, and archaeological studies continue to shed light on possible ancient connections. Would you like details on a specific theory? New chat outline the possible contact between the old civilizations of South America ... The possibility of contact between the ancient civilizations of South America and other parts of the world has been a topic of debate among historians, archaeologists, and researchers. While there is no definitive evidence of widespread contact, several theories and hypotheses suggest potential interactions. Below is an outline of possible contact scenarios: ________________________________________ 1. Trans-Pacific Contact: South America and Polynesia • Evidence of Polynesian-South American Contact: o The sweet potato (kumara), a crop native to South America, was found in Polynesia before European contact. Genetic studies suggest it was introduced to Polynesia around 1000 CE. o Linguistic similarities between the Quechua word for sweet potato (kumal) and the Polynesian term (kumara). o Chicken bones found in Chile, initially thought to be pre-Columbian, sparked debate about Polynesian contact, though this claim has been disputed. • Theories: o Polynesian navigators, known for their long-distance voyaging, may have reached South America and returned with crops or cultural exchanges. o Thor Heyerdahl’s Kon-Tiki expedition (1947) demonstrated the feasibility of raft travel from South America to Polynesia, though it did not prove historical contact. ________________________________________ 2. Trans-Atlantic Contact: South America and Africa/Europe • Possible African Contact: o The Olmec civilization (1200–400 BCE) in Mesoamerica has been linked to African influences due to the colossal stone heads with purported African features. However, mainstream archaeology attributes these to indigenous development. o Claims of pre-Columbian African voyages to the Americas, such as those by the Mali Empire under Abu Bakr II, remain speculative. • Possible European Contact: o The Norse (Vikings) are known to have reached North America (Vinland, circa 1000 CE), but there is no evidence they traveled as far south as South America. o Some fringe theories suggest Phoenician or Roman contact, but these lack credible evidence. ________________________________________ 3. Trans-Pacific Contact: South America and Asia • Possible Chinese Contact: o Gavin Menzies’ controversial book 1421 claims that Chinese admiral Zheng He’s fleet reached the Americas, but this is widely rejected by scholars. o Similarities in art, technology, or cultural practices (e.g., pottery, weaving) are often attributed to independent development rather than direct contact. • Possible Japanese Contact: o The Jomon culture of Japan (14,000–300 BCE) shares some similarities with South American pottery styles, but no direct evidence of contact exists. ________________________________________ 4. Indigenous Connections Within the Americas • Mesoamerican and South American Interactions: o Trade and cultural exchange between Mesoamerican civilizations (e.g., Maya, Aztec) and South American cultures (e.g., Inca) are well-documented. o Shared elements include religious iconography, architectural styles, and agricultural practices. • Amazonian and Andean Connections: o Evidence suggests trade networks linked the Amazon basin with the Andean highlands, facilitating the exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies. ________________________________________ 5. Controversial Theories and Pseudoscience • Diffusionist Theories: o Some theorists propose that ancient civilizations worldwide were connected by seafaring cultures, but these claims often lack empirical evidence. • Pseudoscientific Claims: o Claims of extraterrestrial influence or lost continents (e.g., Atlantis) are not supported by credible evidence. ________________________________________ 6. Challenges in Proving Contact • Lack of Direct Evidence: o Archaeological evidence of sustained contact (e.g., artifacts, written records) is scarce. • Independent Development: o Many similarities between civilizations can be explained by parallel development rather than direct contact. • Dating and Interpretation: o Misinterpretation of artifacts or unreliable dating methods can lead to false conclusions. ________________________________________ 7. Conclusion • While there is intriguing evidence of possible contact, particularly between Polynesia and South America, most mainstream scholars emphasize the independent development of ancient civilizations. • Further research, particularly in genetics, archaeology, and oceanography, may shed more light on these possibilities. This outline highlights the complexity of the topic and the need for rigorous evidence to support claims of ancient contact.

This podcast is brought to you by Jellypod, Inc.

© 2025 All rights reserved.